NO! Seven famous veto highlights China's attitude!

Home > Int'l

NO! Seven famous veto highlights China's attitude!

2017-01-08 11:54:15 269 ℃

Small children who know that our country is one of the permanent members of the United Nations, we have the veto power, then you understand the veto system? Are not all of the minority voting majority? Why do you want to set up a veto system? When is our country? Under what circumstances has it been used?

In October 25, 1971, the 1976th meeting of the general assembly of the United Nations, the participating countries with a total of 76 votes in favor, with a majority of 35 votes against, the majority of the majority of the 17 abstentions, adopted the proposal to restore the legal seat of the United Nations in People's Republic of China.

In the voting procedure of the Security Council, the use of a restricted majority voting rights, specifically, as long as a permanent member of the UN Security Council voted against a decision, even if all the other 14 members of the Security Council voted for the resolution, not through. One vote veto system".

"One vote veto system"As long as there is a vote of no one, no matter how many votes in favor, this decision can not be passed, embodies the principle of unanimity.

In the permanent members of the UN Security Council, the implementation of one vote veto system. China is one of the rights holders.

The one vote veto represents the attitude of a nation and the position of a nation! Since 1971, China has voted more than and 20 votes in the UN Security Council, of which the most famous is the 7. Now, let's take the seven veto tickets as an example, and talk about our country's diplomatic position on the international stage.


August 23, 1972

Adoption of new member states (Bangladesh) resolution

Objection to the reason is that:In China, starting from the opposition dismemberment of a sovereign state, the Security Council voted against.

August 8, 1972, People's Republic of Bangladesh (formerly East Pakistan) to the Security Council to apply to join the United nations.
Because at that time the India forces have yet to leave East Pakistan, Pakistan did not recognize China's vote against Bangladesh, rejected the proposed by the Soviet Union, India, Yugoslavia and Britain on the recommendation of People's Republic of Bangladesh joining the United Nations draft resolution.

This is the first time in China to restore the United Nations seat in the Security Council veto.



January 1997 09

About to Guatemala

Draft resolution for the deployment of United Nations military observers

Objection to the reason is that:

Guatemala and Taiwan to maintain diplomatic relations and jointly signed the so-called annual requirements of Taiwan's participation in the United Nations "proposal in the general committee of the United Nations.

The government of Guatemala's violation of the doings "the purposes and principles of the UN Charter", in violation of resolution 2758th of the UN General Assembly, the damage China's sovereignty and territorial integrity, China interference in internal affairs, hurt the feelings of the people Chinese. This is of course unacceptable.


February 25, 1999

Situation in Macedonia

Objection to the reason is that:
We must resolutely uphold the principle of national reunification! Macedonia and China established diplomatic relations in February 8, 1999, the horse government in 1993 formally approved the establishment of diplomatic relations with Taiwan communique".

In February 25, 1999, the Security Council rejected the draft resolution on the extension of the United Nations Peacekeeping Force stationed in the Macedonian period. Including the Guatemalan proposal of 1997, the two veto is in fact related to the bilateral relationship between China and the relevant countries.

The Macedonian government approved the communique on the establishment of diplomatic relations with Taiwan, which forced China to have the power of veto over the extension of the United Nations peacekeeping force in Macedonia, and resolutely uphold the principle of the reunification of the motherland!



January 12, 2007

Burma opposition to the relevant resolutions

Objection to the reason is that:
To interfere in the internal affairs of other countries firmly say no, veto.

In January 2007, the draft resolution in the United States in drafting the Burma issue, again accused Burma of domestic human rights, AIDS and drugs, said these problems pose a threat to regional security, and asked the Burma government to improve the domestic situation as soon as possible, otherwise it will face greater pressure and consequences.

Local time on the afternoon of January 12th, for the United States and the United Kingdom put forward a draft resolution on the issue of Burma vote, China's permanent representative to the United Nations Wang Guangya solemnly cast a vote against. With China against the draft, as well as Russia and South africa.

July 11, 2008

Peace and security in Africa

(Zimbabwe)Relevant resolutions

Objection to the reason is that:
The United States refused to sanction veto again! China believes that the use of sanctions or threats in the international community does not help solve the problem.

Russia and China voted in July 11, 2008 to vote on a draft resolution on sanctions against Zimbabwe. South Africa, Libya and Vietnam also voted against it. Voted in favor of the United States, Britain, France, Belgium, Italy, Panama, Croatia and other countries.

Zimbabwe has started negotiations on the process, if the Security Council sanctions at this time, Zimbabwe will inevitably interfere with the negotiation process, leading to further deterioration of the situation.



October 4, 2011

Situation in the Middle East (Syria)

Objection to the reason is that:
China and Russia vetoed the draft resolution on sanctions against Syria at the United Nations Security council. The purpose of China's move is to defend the Charter of the United Nations, safeguard Syria's territorial sovereignty and peace in the middle east.

Draft resolution of the Syria issue by the EU countries, such as Britain and France, Russia and China voted against the vote in the UN Security Council passed. The United States, Germany, France and Britain and other Western powers against China and Russia veto.

The British government says Russia's "responsible" for the violence in Syria, the United States is repeatedly denounced Russia free veto, claiming that Russia must give people for freedom and human rights fight out its interpretation".



February 4, 2012

Situation in the Middle East

(Syria)Relevant draft resolution

Objection to the reason is that:
China adheres to the principle of peaceful, dialogue and political solutions to the problem, and voted in a veto with russia.

United Nations Security Council vote on the draft resolution on Syria in February 4th. China voted against russia.China expresses its willingness to actively and constructively participate in consultations on the basis of relevant principles and work with all parties to promote the proper settlement of the Syria issue through political dialogue.

The Chinese side also stressed that it is firmly opposed to the use of force to resolve the Syria issue, and firmly opposes the practice of pushing the "regime change" and so on against the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations and the basic norms governing international relations.

China has always adhered to the path of peaceful development, China pursues an independent foreign policy of peace.

To safeguard world peace and promote common development is the purpose of China's foreign policy. To safeguard our sovereignty, security and development interests and promote world peace and development is the basic goal of China's diplomacy.

Our country each veto is justified, are based on our country's foreign policy based, not only in favor of attitude is also in opposition, express their position, and our country each time a vote shows that our country's own attitude and position!

Want to see more content? Please lock Hubei satellite TV every night, "Changjiang news".

This paper | editor Zhao Quan

Visual creative | Zhao Quan

The editor of | Li Hui