Why do people always say that Huawei's system is inferior to Xiaomi's MIUI?

Home > Sci-Tech

Why do people always say that Huawei's system is inferior to Xiaomi's MIUI?

2018-05-04 20:25:43 68 ℃

Now the mainstream smart phone systems are only Android and iOS. Because of the closed nature of iOS, only Apple phones can be used, and Android systems are different. Especially in the domestic market, basically each has its own deep customization. Android, who is better and there is no definite argument. MIUI system occupies a place in the market with a large number of big fans, and the EMUI system has become the most user-friendly system with the increase in sales of Huawei mobile phones.

Before talking about these two systems, I have to mention the history of both. Millet's first product is not the Xiaomi mobile phone generation, but the MIUI community, which is MIUI V1 ROM Brush Pack, based on the Android 2.3 version of customization, be regarded as the first bus to catch the domestic third-party ROM, MIUI V2, V3 version in At that time, with advanced and exquisite materialized designs, it attracted fans who were keen on brushing machine root to save bricks. This is also the earliest batch of rice flour.

After the release of the generation of the millet millet 2S, MIUI V5 is slowly becoming known to the general public. The most recognizable version of MIUI, and later versions of the UI have also been revised on this basis. MIUI's V587 (powerful domineering) began to be known to everyone. MIUI, which has been settled for 8 years now, is definitely in the leading position in the domestic mobile phone market in terms of the perfection and fluency of localization functions.

In contrast, Huawei's EMUI is somewhat young, and there is no word of mouth marketing strategy. In 2012, Huawei, which was still in China Cooldown, launched a new series of Ascend P1 that can be adapted to the EMUI 1.0 system. Of course, it is not how easy the EMUI is, but the P1 brother model P1 S, as the then global The thinnest cell phone (6.68mm) successfully allowed Huawei to get rid of this range of home-made cottages, and was also the starting point for Huawei to start a counterattack.

With the big brother's supporters, EMUI began to emerge. However, the development of the earlier EMUI was relatively slow. The annual version update was only slightly upgraded until the 2014 EMUI 3.0 and Mate 7's. With the introduction of the UI design, it started to be finalized. Although the flat style is not beautiful, it is not old-fashioned, and the system function has begun to have its own innovation. However, compared to MIUI, Flyme and even Smartisan OS at that time. The EMUI is still far from sufficient as a major driver for consumers to purchase Huawei mobile phones, but fortunately EMUI did not delay the Huawei mobile phone.


History EMUI version

Until the first Android EMUI 5.0 release based on Android 7.0, known as "18 months is not Caton," the concept of the Android system remains at 2.3 The people of the era played a fortifier. At the time of MIUI's ADUI (advertising) boom, Huawei's EMUI was no longer a non-essential attachment system, and it began to become one of the main reasons for consumers to purchase Huawei mobile phones. EMUI is still the fastest update to the Android version Speed, and began to lead the system to the direction of AI intelligence optimization.

Of course, from the current community activity point of view The number of EMUI fans is far from MIUI, but to say that EMUI is not as sloppy as MIUI is easy to use, there is a millet note 3 and Huawei nova 2s around, and both are the latest versions of MIUI 9.0 and EMUI 8.0. These two platforms do some minor comparisons.

UI UI Comparisons

The first is the UI interface. All of them are set as the default theme, MIUI style is very young and lively, dynamic icons are also designed for applications such as system and Wechat, EMUI is low-key in color, the overall style is simple and simple, and both are customizable. Theme and font features, but from the completion of the classificationIn terms of degree, MIUI's theme resources are more abundant. The beauty of the official theme is also more in line with the mainstream aesthetics, and Huawei's official theme is the color version of the mobile phone, and does not optimize third-party applications, so the overall looks uncoordinated.

Video Clip Interface

On the localization function, the two can be said to be different Up and down, taking several commonly used functions, EMUI's screenshot function can be started with a single finger joint tapping the screen, the success rate is very high, and can be directly used to intercept the interception of local graphics, very convenient. There are also double-fingered joint recordings, where the knuckles are vertical lines in the middle of the screen to open the split screen, etc., which are all new ways of interaction.

Separation function

In terms of details, MIUI is even better than a stamp, such as The recording screen supports the setting of the format, the editing of the picture and the video editing function are all more perfect, as well as the negative one-screen shortcut function, the application of multiple open and so on. At the same time, after updating the latest versions of the two systems, they all support a word-expanding function similar to the big bang, and the experience is relatively smooth. In addition, both cloud service functions basically cover book functions such as contacts, text messages, photos, and mobile phone search.

Background Remaining Comparison

In addition to functionality, evaluating a system is good or bad, Fluency is the most important indicator. Both MIUI and EMUI have intelligent back-end management mechanisms. The two mobile phones have the same 6GB of running memory, and about 3.7GB are available after clearing the background. After opening the background applications of the US Mission, Gaode, Taobao, Weibo, and WeChat, the remaining MIUI memory is about 3.3G. The remaining EMUI is about 3.1GB, and there is no phenomenon of killing the background after 10 minutes. And in the use of the process did not appear Kardon phenomenon.

Android System Architecture

However, with the recent EMUI Karton phenomenon SomeoneThink it is for safety considerations. There is a saying that every Android application opens a virtual machine for loading. If a virus or something happens, it will only attack the virtual machine, not the main system. Huawei adopted this approach for security considerations. Samsung's negative optimization also adopted this approach. For this statement, it is exactly the chicken butt (flip). First of all, every Android application opens a virtual machine to load for each application. This sentence is understandable, but this virtual machine is copied from the Zygote process (the main process) in order to save every application from running. The time to load system libraries and resources can greatly increase the startup speed.

And at the core of these Android operating systems, it can be said that all current third-party Android systems will adopt this approach. If anyone runs a virtual machine and runs the APK directly on the underlying Linux kernel, then congratulations, the first domestic mobile platform system was officially launched, there is no "middleman" trouble, rolling Android is almost iOS.

ART Virtual Machine Instead of Dalvik Virtual Machine

Android System Catoned Because of Virtual Machines The problem has been solved well since Android 5.0 came out. Instead of canceling the virtual machine (DVM), it uses Google's own ART (Android Runtime), which is essentially a virtual machine, but it only effectively solves every application running on the DVM (Dalvik virtual machine). Compile the application into machine code (running on Linux). ART stores the compiled machine code locally at the time of installation, so that the efficiency of the operation will increase with a one-step compiling process. What's more, the practice of using a virtual machine is not for security reasons, but rather to prevent interference between applications and the hassle of reloading system libraries.

Android Farewell to Cardon's Era

Actually, now third-party systems have evolved into Mainstream of these systems in all aspects of functionAnd can not pull too much difference, the fluency of the system is also mostly Google to consider. The first judgment of the consumer for the system is the interface design, after all, the third-party system is also equivalent to a theme of the Android system. According to reason, native Android is the most fluent, but Google's 404, and the domestic application of the "Fallenism Flurry", so there is a better control of the application of chaotic third-party systems. So again, there is no best system, only the most suitable system.